These creatures annoying with the expreview seem to have some slides of AMD 'of nearest mobile platforms of S.
We published AMD 'roadmaps of S of the day of analyst (November 2008), thus they 's interesting to see whether both - together five months of distant - differ much.
To assume the first slide is correct, 2009 seems enough more or less even, really, with the platform of Tiger put in the high-speed motorboat by the 45nm Caspian piece the �� of duel-core these of the interfaces with memory DDR2 at dual channel. The tiddlywinks of support obtain a bump, with RS880M, probably a rapid-synchronized version of M780G. Discrete GPUs are derivations on current designs, and we expect that clock-speeds assemble some.
2010 bring with him the platform of the Danube, comprising piece of Champlain. Extensible with four cores to give at Intel 's the current line of central processing unit of treatment of execution per race for its money, Champlain will emigrate the mobile platform at end raised with DDR3-1,066. Other that, the tiddlywinks of support looks at to be more or less even, though with the newer southbridge which brings to a couple more ports of USB and RAID. What 's really interesting are the new graphs, definite like �series of Manhattan �. The bet is that they 'about the models 40nm based on the nearest parts of office.
Truths changes are brought from 2011, because AMD brings Unit-and-GPU love in the form of APU of Llano (treatment unit accelerated - fusion) under the platform of Sabine. AMD specifies that it will pass to a process 32nm for Llano, which seems eerily similar at Intel 's Westmere (Arrandale) on the first glance.
Llano 'arrived of S will require a change of casing, to FS1, with a new core-logic of support. We 'd also bet that the integrated graphs will be DX11-compliant and comprise the next iteration of the technology of video-treatment, UVD 3.0.
What we want to know, now, is how Unit-and-GPU architectures of competition will play outside. Intel will be first in addition to beater with Westmere, follow-up one year or so much later by AMD 's Llano. Intel has, discutablement, a better (and prompter for launching on the market) know-how of central processing unit of treatment, while AMD/ATI is much stronger in the space of graphs. Who is lit your money?
No comments:
Post a Comment